Welcome Guest ( Log In)

 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> 6 identical pieces?

tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 4 2011, 01:34 PM
Post #1


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



Ok, heres a riddle for anyone interested. I have created this shape, now I want to split it into 6 identical pieces for manufacturing. However, when I split the part to create the section (green part) and reposition it to form the complete shape it will not line up.
I am not entirely sure what part of the puzzle I'm missing.
If anyone can help. It would be greatly appreciated.

BTW, I am told from client that SolidWorks cannot create this part and it can't unfold it to a flat either. So I'm 99% there, just 1 % throwing me off.
I would love to rub it in this guys face if possible.

thanks
Tom

PS Carlo, I think this is right up your alley!!!!

Attached Image
Attached File  Kendall_1145.ics ( 2.5mb ) Number of downloads: 285


This post has been edited by tlehnhaeuser: Mar 4 2011, 01:35 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cary OConnor
post Mar 4 2011, 04:18 PM
Post #2


TriBall
********

Group: IronCAD Employees
Posts: 5,615
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 17



Hi Tom,

Using the original surface shape:

Place Iso curves at 16.666666666666666666666666666667% increments (100/6).
Copy the curves up.
Create ruled surfaces between the curves.
Trim the surface (using split all) and keep all sections.
Create a Surface from the split faces.
Unfold the surface using the Unfold Surface/Solid Tool.

Attached is the surface constructed model.

Cary

Attached File  Kendall_1145a.ics ( 2.58mb ) Number of downloads: 237
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 4 2011, 05:32 PM
Post #3


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



Hmmm gotta figure out your way. the only problem is the client wants the final sections to be like the green parts shown in the original image.
tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 4 2011, 05:53 PM
Post #4


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



I think I may on the trial. if I use 100/12 then I get the middles. Thank you!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 15 2011, 01:13 PM
Post #5


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



Ok new twist to this, the client wants the bends to 1.75" radius on insides.
I have attached scene and image showing where I need to apply tangencies. Since all the curves need to be on the same diameter, so I am bit stumped how to get the tangent points as indicated in image.
any feedback is welcomed.
Tom


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

Attached File(s)
Attached File  Kendall_1145.ics ( 2.71mb ) Number of downloads: 223
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cary OConnor
post Mar 15 2011, 02:25 PM
Post #6


TriBall
********

Group: IronCAD Employees
Posts: 5,615
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 17



How did you determine where the curve hit the circular curve? If you make a point there (and move the curve away a little), then you can use Parallel to Edge End or Parallel to Edge and pick the point. Then move the curve endpoint back to that location. Then adjust the value.

It would be a Nice ER to add the Ctrl-Alt to work in those right-click options to avoid the extra move steps.

Cary
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 16 2011, 09:34 AM
Post #7


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



QUOTE(Cary OConnor @ Mar 15 2011, 01:25 PM)
How did you determine where the curve hit the circular curve?
*



The point is a visual guess, hence the need for a tangency. I know about the End Parallel but it still relys on the estimated point of tangency.

tx
tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cary OConnor
post Mar 16 2011, 09:59 AM
Post #8


TriBall
********

Group: IronCAD Employees
Posts: 5,615
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 17



Not sure I follow. That curve is a spline. The spline needs to be connected at a point. At that point, you can make the spline tangent to the curve it is connecting to. So if you make a true point on the Circle where you want it to connect, then you can connect the spline to be tangent to that point. Otherwise the spline can be any tangent it wants around a circle (there is no given direction where).

Cary
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 16 2011, 12:10 PM
Post #9


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



I inderstand what your saying, but let me put it this way.

I have the two "circles" that are actual "bent" along a diameter. then I want to draw a "line" that is "tangent" to the two circles, however the "line" is "bent" along the same diameter. That make sense?

Honesty, I could guess where the point would be and then have the "arcs" maintain a parallet to end, this make change the bend radii slight and on this I could probably get away with it. However, if this part needed to be 100% accurate, not sure how it would be achieved.
Tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronKevin
post Mar 16 2011, 01:26 PM
Post #10


TriBall
********

Group: IronCAD Employees
Posts: 18,110
Joined: 21-November 06
Member No.: 27,213



Sounds like you would have to draw all this in a 2D Sketch then use the Wrap command to wrap it on the cylinder.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 18 2011, 10:44 AM
Post #11


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



Thanks Kev,
Not sure how I would do that, I will have to try to test.

However, I have completed this job to much amazement of the client who tried several other designers who use SolidWorks and all had failed before coming to me.

He is so impressed, that I think he will look to purchase IronCAD in the near future.
The parts are on the CNC and should see the results next week.

thanks all for the help.
I have attached a video of my complete work.
Tom
Attached File  job189.7z ( 1.02mb ) Number of downloads: 268
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cary OConnor
post Mar 18 2011, 02:40 PM
Post #12


TriBall
********

Group: IronCAD Employees
Posts: 5,615
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 17



Looks Cool! Glad you were able to complete it. Now go get them to give you a reason not to buy smile.gif

Cary
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cborer
post Mar 19 2011, 04:12 AM
Post #13


TriBall
********

Group: Community Members
Posts: 1,606
Joined: 24-October 01
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 203



Tom!
Very Cool!
Impressive!
How did you do that?
Carlo

This post has been edited by cborer: Mar 19 2011, 04:17 AM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 21 2011, 09:59 AM
Post #14


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



Hi Carlo,
REquired some learning curve on my part as to what some the more advanced surfacing tools actually do.
As it turns out the use the Iso-parametric surface tools was CRITICAL to the accuracy of this part. Without it, I probably would not have been able to make this.
I cant supply the files, but heres a snapshott of the construction geometry I created to build this part.
Cheers
Tom

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cborer
post Mar 21 2011, 11:47 AM
Post #15


TriBall
********

Group: Community Members
Posts: 1,606
Joined: 24-October 01
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 203



Hi Tom
I thought you wouldn't offer the file! smile.gif
I would do the same! smile.gif

Looks like some work!
Thanks
Carlo
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tlehnhaeuser
post Mar 21 2011, 11:55 AM
Post #16


TriBall
********

Group: Channel Partners
Posts: 5,691
Joined: 17-October 01
From: Commack, New York
Member No.: 48



QUOTE(cborer @ Mar 21 2011, 10:47 AM)
Hi Tom
I thought you wouldn't offer the file!  smile.gif
I would do the same!  smile.gif

Looks like some work!
Thanks
Carlo
*



laugh.gif
If it was mine, I consider it, but this for a client. when completed it will be high polished aluminum. If I can get a finished picture show you.

Actually, creating the construction geometry was easy and the 3D curves as well. the hardest part was getting the parts spilt perfectly to be able to make this piece with 6 IDENTICAL pieces. After many trial and error using split tool, that was not the answer, the answer ended up being after creating the SURFCASe was to create 2 Iso-parametric curves on the top and bottom surfaces to use in loft then the loft surface as a cutter.

T
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cborer
post Mar 21 2011, 02:10 PM
Post #17


TriBall
********

Group: Community Members
Posts: 1,606
Joined: 24-October 01
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 203



Cool!
Thanks Tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 

All content copyright IronCAD 2000-2008 Low-Bandwidth View Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 11:16 PM